Fresh stories, announcements and offers about Divorce Lawyer, Lawyer, Legal services, straight from our business.
Looking for professional legal support in family matters? R. Siddiqui is the best divorce lawyer in South Delhi, specializing in divorce, alimony, child custody, and property settlement cases. With years of experience and a client-focused approach, he provides reliable, compassionate, and result-oriented legal guidance.
In a recent judgment, the Delhi High Court granted divorce to a husband on the ground of mental cruelty. The Court held that a wife pressuring her husband to abandon his mother and sister amounts to cruelty under the Hindu Marriage Act. 地 Key Takeaways from the Judgment.; Forcing a spouse to sever ties with close family r mental cruelty. Denying access to one's child can further strengthen the claim. Emotional manipulation and persistent coercion can be as damaging as physical abuse in marriage. f Why this matters, This judgment adds to the evolving jurisprudence around mental cruelty in matrimonial disputes. It highlights the importance of respecting a spouse's emotional, familial, and social bonds within marriage.
Mere general allegations of harassment without specific details would not be sufficient to continue criminal proceedings, says SC The Supreme Court, in a matter concerning alleged matrimonial cruelty, recently said that the term “cruelty” cannot be established without specific instances and the tendency of invoking the provisions, without mentioning any specific detail, weakens the case of the prosecution and casts serious aspersions on the probability of the version of the complainant. A bench of Justices B V Nagarathna and R Mahadevan observed that the court cannot ignore the missing specifics in the FIR which is the basic premise for invoking the criminal machinery of the State. The apex court set aside the Allahabad High Court's order dated February 27, 2024. The bench stressed, "In such cases involving allegations of cruelty and harassment, there would normally be a series of offending acts, which would be required to be spelt out by the complainant against perpetrators in specific terms to initiate criminal proceedings against them. Therefore, mere general allegations of harassment without pointing out the specific details would not be sufficient to continue criminal proceedings against any person" Best Divorce lawyer in delhi Provide best advice for family issues/matrimonial cases. Best Family Lawyer in Delhi. Online consultation.
The Delhi High Court has clarified that extra-marital affairs are not a criminal offence, but they can lead to serious legal, social, and financial consequences. While the Supreme Court had already decriminalized adultery, the High Court emphasized that such affairs can cause mental trauma, economic loss, and social stigma. Importantly, if a marriage breaks down due to an affairs the affected spouse can legally seek compensation (damages) from the person involved with their partner. The Court highlighted that extra-marital relationships may not attract criminal liability, but they can still result in heavy consequences for families and children. #DelhiHighCourt #LandmarkJudgment #LegalUpdate #IndianLaw #ExtraMaritalAffair #AdulteryLaw #MarriageAndLaw #FamilyLaw #LegalRights #Sociallmpact #MentalTrauma #LegalAwareness #MarriageMatters #KnowYourRights. Best Matrimonial Lawyer in Delhi. Best Family Lawyer in Delhi. Best Divorce Lawyer in Delhi. Best High Court lawyer.
The Delhi High Court has delivered a landmark ruling in a divorce case, holding that if a wife pressures her husband to sever ties with his mother, sister, or family, it amounts to mental cruelty. The court emphasized that marriage is built on mutual respect and balance, not one partner's unreasonable demands. Such behavior, the court said, can be a valid ground for divorce under Indian law. #Divorcelawyerdelhi #MatrimonialLawyerDelhi #DelhiHighCourt #DivorceLaw #MentalCruelty #FamilyLaw #IndianJudiciary #MarriageAndLawstreet. #LandmarkJudgment #LegalUpdate #IndianCourts #MatrimonialDisputes #FamilyMatters
The Supreme Court has dismissed a false dowry harassment case under Section 498A, ruling that vague and baseless allegations cannot be grounds for prosecution. In Ghazanfar Ahmad Khan vs. Shah Bano Begum, the Court upheld the High Court's finding that there was no solid evidence against the husband's family. The Constitution Bench clarified that Section 498A should not be misused and strong evidence is necessary to prove such serious charges. This landmark ruling reinforces that laws meant to protect must not be weaponized for personal revenge. #SupremeCourt #Section498A #FalseCases #DowryHarassment #LegalUpdate #CourtRuling #Judgment2025 #JusticePrevails #LawAndJustice #MisuseOfLaw #ConstitutionBench #LandmarkJudgment #RuleOfLaw #LegalAwareness #legalnews #India Best Matrimonial lawyer in Delhi. Best Divorce Lawyer in Delhi Best 498-A lawyer in Delhi Best Dowry lawyer in Delhi
The Supreme Court has upheld a father's rights to visitation and maintaining a relationship with his child after a divorce, emphasizing that a child has a right to the affection of both parents. Courts will prioritize the child's welfare, so while visitation is generally granted, it must be balanced with the child's health, safety, and present living situation. The court aims to ensure the father remains part of the child's life, even if it requires modifications to visitation schedules or methods, such as video calls, to accommodate the child's needs. If you are stopped from meeting your child or denied visitation, you can file a case under the Guardians and Wards Act, 1890. You can also use the case reference of - kiran Raju Penumscha vs. Tejaswini chaudhary. Best Divorce Lawyer in Delhi. Best Matrimonial Lawyer in Delhi. Online consultation for any Matrimonial case in delhi.
The Art of Cross-Examination is the sharpest weapon in the armoury of an advocate. It is where 'Falsus in uno, falsus in omnibus'(false in one thing, false in everything) reveals the true character of testimony, A skilful cross is not mere questioning, but an exercise of wit, precision, and audi alteram partem (hear the other side), aimed to extract truth and demolish falsehood. As the courts observe, cross-examination is the greatest legal engine ever invented for the discovery of truth'" #CrossExamination #ArtOfAdvocacy #FalsusInUno #AudiAlteramPartem #LegalMaxims #LitigationSkills #CourtroomTactics #LawyerLife #AdvocateRameezSiddiqui #TruthInCourt #JusticePrevails #CriminalLawyer #FamilyLawyer
Arrest should not be made in a mechanical manner and that anticipatory bail is the rule rather than the exception. RELEVANT JUDGEMENTS ARE AS UNDER 👇🏼 Supreme Court in Thulia Kali Vs The State of Tamil Nadu, (1972)3 SCC 393; Gurbaksh Singh Sibbia & Ors. Vs. State of Punjab, (1980)SCC (Cri)465, and DN Rao Vs. The State (Orissa High Court), 2001 Crimes-3-409, Lal Kamlendra Pratap Singh Vs State of UP, 2010 ALL MR (Cri.) 2030; Sukhwant Singh & Ors. Vs State of Punjab, 2010 CrLJ 1435; Chandraswami Vs. CBI, Cri.Appeal No.1912/1996 SC; Siddharam Satlingappa Mhetre Vs. State of Maharashtra, Cri. Appeal No.2271/2010 (SC); Jogiinder Kumar Vs. State of UP, WP (Cri.)No.9 /1994 SC; Harsh Sawhney Vs Union Territory Chattisgarh (Cri.) 110/ 1978, which lay down that arrest should not be made in a routine manner and that anticipatory bail is the rule rather than the exception. Best Criminal lawyer in Delhi Best Bail Lawyer in Delhi. Best Divorce Lawyer in Delhi.
A recent Supreme Court of India judgment, in the case of Vibhor Garg vs. Neha, has reaffirmed the crucial role of electronic evidence in matrimonial cases. The Court has clarified that a husband can present digital evidence such as videos, photos, and chat messages as solid proof in court. This landmark decision addresses the long-standing legal debate on the admissibility of secretly recorded conversations between spouses.The Court's ruling underscores the principle that in the pursuit of justice and a fair trial, the relevance of evidence can outweigh an overbroad interpretation of privacy rights in matrimonial litigation. This judgment marks a significant development for individuals involved in family disputes, providing a clear legal framework for the use of electronic evidence. It highlights the importance of consulting with a legal expert. to ensure such evidence is properly collected, authenticated, and presented in court
(WP(C) NO. 26123 OF 2024)_ Hon'ble Kerala High Court Father's Name In Birth Certificate Can't Be Changed Without Court Order, DNA Test Report. It’s recently held that a Registrar of Births and Deaths has no authority to unilaterally alter the paternity details in a birth certificate where the child was born during a valid marriage, without a court order or notice to the lawful father. The court referred to Section 15 of the Registration of Births and Deaths Act, 1969, and Rule 11 of the Kerala Registration of Births and Deaths Rule, 199, which lays down the procedure to correct or cancel an entry in the Register of Births and Deaths. The Court noted that the power conferred on a Registrar under Section 15 and Rule 11 are circumscribed and limited to the correction of clerical or formal errors or entries fraudulently or improperly made, and not matters of disputed paternity, which require a full fledged trial and adjudication. The Court held that if the father's name has to be changed in the birth records, a DNA test report, an agreement attested before a Notary Public and an order from a competent Court are to be produced according to the circular issued by the Local Self Government Department. The Court quashed the impugned substituted birth report and certificate and directed the Registrar to reconsider the application submitted by the respondent strictly in accordance with law and affording the petitioner an opportunity to be heard.
Chief Justice BR Gavai recounted that the child had also attacked her father with a stick. Hearing a child custody case, Chief Justice of India BR Gavai warned a 12-year-old girl's mother against "spoiling her mind" after the child demanded Rs 1 crore from her father if he wanted her to stay with him. The child, the court noted, also attacked her father with a stick and warned her mother that this would "come back" to her someday. That in September last year, the Supreme Court asked the district legal services authority to appoint a paralegal volunteer to ensure that the father's visitation rights are implemented. CJI Mr. Gavai recounted that the child had also attacked her father with a stick in the past. yesterday, again the girl has declined to come with me. And she says that 'you are harassing my mother, you have filed a contempt (case), you please give Rs 1 crore, otherwise I will not go. On top of that, in the school records, the mother has deleted the name of the father," Mr Patwali said. He added that "punishing the mother is not going to achieve anything" and sought mediation in the matter. When the mother's counsel, Anubha Agrawal, said she was open to mediation, Chief Justice Gavai told the mother, "You are unnecessarily dragging your child, you are spoiling the career of your child, you are spoiling her mind. This will come back someday." Best Matrimonial lawyer in Delhi NCR.
